For long the perils associated with passive smoking have been cited as reasons to seek a complete ban on smoking in public places, but if a new study is to be believed the dangers of second had smoke have been exaggerated.
In a new study, long time American anti-tobacco activist and physician Dr Michael Siegal has expressed grave concern over the “obfuscation of facts” about second hand smoke.
“The inaccuracies lie in overstating the effect of a single, transient exposure to second hand smoke – a claim which cannot be validated by any scientific evidence,” he says in the study published in October 10.
Siegal contends that only repeated exposure to second hand smoke is likely to increase the risk of a heart attack for a non-smoker. “As far as the actual possibility of causing a heart attack is concerned, it is all the more likely. For the matter, even chronic exposure to second-hand smoke cannot cause a heart attack in a healthy non-smoker,” he said.
Drawing parallels between eating a single fatty meal and being exposed to second hand smoke for 20-20 minutes, he said, “the 30 and 20 minute claims were based on studies that observed merely ‘changes’ in the heart’s functioning”.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
This post is BS. If you want the truth, head over to this url and find out how bad second hand smoke really is, not this junk 'science'.
Post a Comment